The last natural eastern river?

Importance of transboundary protected areas in the conservation of biodiversity

Cadisflies (Trichoptera) of Polish lakes… ask about origin lake species and post-glacial colonization

Is it the sustainable coexistence between aquatic insects and people possible in the city area?

 

European refuges of entomofauna – caddisflies (Trichoptera) in protected area in Central and Eastern Europe  download presentation from Bialowieza (2,56 MB)

The last natural eastern river? Caddisflies (Trichoptera) of the Neman River

 

Large lowland rivers, with flooded valley not changed by human activity, are very rare in Europe now. It is interesting a problem relationships between hydrobiont’s fauna neighboring water bodies: a river, tributaries, oxbow pools, lakes, temporary pools, springs. Are there faunas these habitats different? Are there migrations? Which strategies have aquatic insects and if is necessary neighbouring these habitats for water insects? Answers for these questions allow to anticipate of an affect of river regulations for caddisfly fauna.

Caddisflies were investigated during spring, summer and autumn in 1997-99, on 40 localities, situated between Lida and Grodno (Belarus – middle course of the Neman River). Larvae were caught by using a manual hydrobiological sampler and a dredge, adults were caught using entomological net using a light-trap.

2355 larvae, pupa and imagines of Trichoptera from 74 species were collected (about 60% Belarussian species). In the qualitative analyse, fauna of rivers and streams, water bodies on valley (oxbows, temporary pools) and springs were distinguished. In the quantitative analyze, water bodies with poor fauna (springs and artificial waters) were distinguished very close. Caddisflies of the Neman River, large and small tributaries were different.

Basis on some different analyses there were distinguished different assemblages, typical for various habitats: potamal and rthitral zone. Different dominant species occur in all this assemblages. Effect of “neighboring waters bodies” and animal’s migrations were showed for all waters bodies occurring in a lowland river valley. Life strategies of caddisflies were analysed. It could be expected that relative eurytop strategies and wide geographical distribution of some caddisflies (possibility to inhabiting various waters: running and standing water bodies) are adaptation to live in changing post-glacial landscape (a lakeland landscape) and in a landscape with large lowland rivers.

 

Importance of transboundary protected areas in the conservation of biodiversity

 

Transboundary protected areas  have  a great importance for international cooperation in protection of species diversity and  typical for Europe ecosystems. Especially for wetland habitats.

Basis on analyse of caddisfly fauna occurring in protected areas in Poland (national parks, landscape parks, natural reserve) we can say, that existing protected area are not enough for preserve a biodiversity. All our material describes caddisfly fauna from 17 national parks, 6 landscape parks and 6 reserves of nature. Some of national parks, the most of landscape parks and all reserves of nature still need to be investigated. Till now, 239 species were found within all protected areas of Poland (87% species occurring in Poland). Among 74 threatened species, only 41 were found in protected areas. The maximum number of threatened species found in an individual protected area was 14. The results show, that there is a need to investigate the caddisfly fauna from protected areas of Poland. The results also show, that a significant number of threatened species do not occur within protected areas of Poland. These species need the other form of protection. May be in “not-protected” areas. Aquatic entomofauna of protected areas in Belarus, Ukraine and some other eastern countries is recognised worse. But in these countries occur very old and natural landscapes with species threatened in Europe.

Additionally way for biodiversity protection is a creation new, transboundary protected areas including some “national” protected areas as soon as not protected areas with less human activity. For example the Augustowska Primeval Forest, which is a central part of the proposed region of "The Green Lungs of Europe". There are more similar areas in the Baltic Region. Most of them need entomological researches and faunal monitoring in changing landscapes.

 

 

Cadisflies (Trichoptera) of Polish lakes… ask about origin lake species and post-glacial colonization

 

Caddisflies (Insecta: Trichoptera) are one of the most important aquatic groups that inhabit lake littorals. The ecological significance of Trichoptera in lakes results from the large quantity of larvae, their relatively large partition in the littroral macrobenthos biomass and their presence among most functional feeding groups.

The paper presents the results if multi-year research into caddis-flies inhabiting Polish lakes, including the  species composition and the structure of habitat distribution. It is also an attempt to answer the following questions: what are the species occur in Polish lakes, what is the grade of specify of lake fauna  and there any differences in larvae distribution in lakes differing in regional location, in trophy type and catchment’s basin? The question of fauna origin, including the regions, environmental and life-history styles was brought up. The authors also tried to formulate the general principles (patterns) of caddis larvae distribution in lakes. This work is the first to provide relatively full characteristics of larvae distribution in Polish lakes and the first such work on European lakes. Due to the fact that littoral distribution of other invertebrates have not been described well, this work opens the discussion on macrobenthos distribution in lakes.

The research material comprises close to 70 thousands caddis larvae and adults, collected between 1951 and 1997 from around 200 lakes located across Poland. Main results were published (Czachorowski 1998). Now, it will be compared with some data on caddisflies from Belarussian lakes and lowland rivers.

The analysis of the available data showed that 60% of the species (154 species) of the national caddisfly fauna is co-related to lakes. The author suggests distinguishing three ecological groups as follows: limnepbionts (lake species, exclusively or mainly occurring in lakes), limnephilous )often and numerously occurring in lakes) and limnexens (accidentally occurring in lakes) bearing in mind that division lines between them are not sharp. Among the 49 limnepbionts, almost all species occur widely in regions located in lowlands. Most of the limnebionts inhabit the elodeids (32 species), a large number of them inhabit helophytes (25) and few of them inhabit the shallowest littoral. Among the 39 limnephilous, as many as 31 occur widely and a few of them occur in narrow areas and mountains. The lagest quantity of limnephilous are connected with the potamal zone (25 species), less with rhitral (7) small water bodies (4) or with peat-bog water (2). Limnephilous inhabit mainly the shallowest, not overgrown littoral (10 species) and the helophytes (15), more seldom elodeis (5). In the group of limnexens (66 species) only around half of the species occurred widely and 8 species occurred in narrower ranges and in mountains. Seven of the limnexens are connected with springs (crenal), 20 of them with steams (rhitral zone), 23 with rivers (potamal zone), 10 of the with small water bodies and 6 with marsh waters. Clearly most of the species are connected with the shallowest, not overgrown littoral (30 species), less with the helophytes (15) and only 4 with elodeids. 22 species were also distinguished in relation to dystrophic and marsh waters (tyrphobionts and tyrphilous).

Analyzed caddisfly fauna can be described as relatively eurytopic and widely-occurring with numerous species of northern distribution. The most specific fauna inhabits dipper littoral of lakes (elodeids zone) and to a lesser extent the helophytes. The largest quantity of accidental species is present in the shallowest, not overgrown littoral (mainly in mountain lakes with low trophy).

Three levels of differentiation could be distinguished in the larvae distribution characteristics: geographic (regional), landscape (lake type and influence of the surrounding) and habitatual (habitats in lakes). The levels illustrate the three dispersion aspect. The geographical differentiation may result from climatic and historic differences (post0glacial species dispersion). The landscape differentiation may have been caused by the influence of fauna migration from the other water habitats neighboring with lakes (e.g. from rivers, peat-bogs, fens, canals) and it could be also interpreted as adaptation to life in a changing landscape, or possibility as living in water habitats of different types which neighbors with each other in the Lakeland landscape and in a valley of gig lowland rivers (lakes, rivers, temporary pools etc.).

 

 

Is it the sustainable coexistence between aquatic insects and people possible in the city area?

 

Stanisław Czachorowski

Lech Pietrzak

 

University of Warmia and Mazury

Department of Ecology and Environmental Protection

Plac Lodzki 3; 10-727 Olsztyn; POLAND

e-mails: stanislaw.czachorowski@uwm.edu.pl , lpietrzak@wp.pl

 

 

Introduction

Water resources, water ecosystems and water management have a very special place in the efforts of countries in the Baltic Sea region, as soon as in Masurian Lake District (northern Poland). Aquatic insects are important elements in water and terrestrial ecosystems. They are of great economic importance. As an element of biocenosis, insects influent on working of ecosystems. Hematophagic insects (e.g many water dipterans) have impact on tourism and recreation in urban areas. From these points of view it is very important to recognize ecological processes take place into water ecosystems and water entomofauna.

The urbanization process drastically changes the natural ecosystems. Water insects in cities depend on the modifications of the natural water reservoirs and the quality of anthropogenic ones. The development of the city area decides on preserving or destruction of the natural fauna. So, it is very important question: is a sustainable development a chance for the coexistence of the people and the insects? Additionally is very difficult to implement sustainable water and wetland systems without understanding aquatic entomofauna dynamics.

About 3340 species of aquatic insects live in Poland (Czachorowski, Buczyński 2000), among them  280 species of caddisflies (about 900 species in Europe - Illies 1978).

 

Materials and methods

Two towns: Złocieniec and Olsztyn and one order of aquatic insects – caddisflies (Trichoptera)  were chosen for the first part on investigation.  Złocieniec is the small city (15 thousands inhabitants) in the north-western part of Poland (Drawski Lake District). Materials were collected from 1999 to 2001. There were examined water bodies inside the borders of the city: lakes (Rakowo Duże Lake, Rakowo Małe Lake, Maleszewo Lake), rivers (Drawa River and Wąsawa River), streams and small water bodies (including anthropogenic ones).

Olsztyn is the capital of Warmia and Mazury province (north-eastern part of Poland). It is placed in Masurian Lake District. There are about 170 thousands inhabitants. Materials were collected from 1983 to 2001 inside the borders of the city. There were examined lakes (Kortowskie Lake, Długie Lake, Skanda Lake, Czarne Lake, Lakes by the Radiowa Street), Łyna River, streams and small water bodies (including anthropogenic ones).

Caddis larvae were caught by standard, hydrobiological methods and adults by an entomological net in the vicinity of water bodies. The larvae were selected in the terrain and preserved in 70% alcohol. They were recognized later in the laboratory.

The naturalness of the fauna was assessed by naturality indexes (Czachorowski, Buczyński 1999). The naturality indexes are quite new method, which was worked out on the basis of Fisher’s biocenosis naturality indexes (Fischer 1996). There are two naturality indexes: quantitative naturality index (Wni) and qualitative naturality index (Wns). They can have value from 1 to 16.

 

  ,   

Wns - qualitative naturality index,

Wni - quantitative naturality index,

Wzei - coefficient of ecological importance for i species in given biocenose,

s - number of all species in given biocenose,

ni  - number of specimens of i species,

N - number of all specimens of all species in given biocenose (number of all founded specimens).

 

The biodiversity of examined fauna was calculated using index of Shannon-Weaver.

H’ – Index of Shannon-Weaver

pi – ratio of i species

n – number of species

 

Results

7740 specimens of caddis flies (7473 larvae and 267 adults) were caught. There were 5997 specimens from Olsztyn and 1743 specimens from Złocieniec (Tab. 1). 78 species of caddis flies were affirmed in Olsztyn. It is 29% species known from Poland and 46% species known from north-eastern Poland. 63 species of Trichoptera were found in Złocieniec. It is 23% of species known from Poland and 43% species known from Pomerania. The number of species founded in Złocieniec and Olsztyn is higher or comparable to natural areas (Fig.1).

The rare and endangered species were found in the both cities (according to Szczęsny 1992). There were two endangered species and three rare species in Olsztyn. Endangered species were: Oecetis tripunctata (Fabricius, 1793) (small, anthropogenic pound in the centre of the city) and Hydropsyche siltalai Doehler, 1963 (Łyna River). Rare species were: Limnephilus fuscinervis (Zetterstedt, 1840) (small water bodies in suburban area, next to Skanda Lake), Ceraclea nigronervosa (Retzius 1783) (Łyna River), and Ylodes sp. (Długie Lake and Czarne Lake). Three endangered and three rare species were found in Złocieniec. All of endangered species occurred in Drawa River. They are: Hydropsyche siltalai Doehler, 1963, Oecetis testacea (Curtis, 1834) and Leptocerus interruptus (Fabricius, 1775). Rare species were: Limnephilus fuscinervis (Zetterstedt, 1840) (temporary water bodies in clay-pits), Limnephilus elegans Curtis, 1834 (drainage ditch) and Ylodes reuteri (McLachlan, 1880) (Drawa River).

In Złocieniec the most natural fauna occurred in Rakowo Małe Lake, Rakowo Duże Lake, examined rivers, clay pits, temporary pools in alders and stream that flow in Rakowo Male Lake. The smallest values of naturality indexes had fauna of two streams flow out from lakes. Also in Olsztyn natural fauna inhabited a lot of examined water bodies: lake by Radiowa street, lake by Parkowa street, Czarne Lake, Długie Lake, anthropogenic water reservoir, small water bodies from Town-Park and small water bodies next to Skanda Lake. Least natural fauna were funded in peat bogs, stream flow in Kortowskie Lake and Kortówka River.

The naturality indexes calculated for examined water bodies are comparable to indexes calculated for water bodies from “natural” areas (Fig. 2).

In Złocieniec the highest biodiversity indexes had fauna from rivers, Rakowo Małe Lake, Rakowo Duże Lake and clay pits. The last various fauna was founded in temporary pools in alders, streams that flow in Rakowo Male Lake, streams that flow out from Maleszewo Lake, drainage ditch and anthropogenic pound. In Olsztyn the most various fauna occurred in examined lakes, rivers and some of small water bodies (in the centre of the city and next to Skanda Lake).

Similar to the naturality indexes, the biodiversity of examined waterbodies is comparable to biodiversity of ones from “natural” areas (fig. 3).

It is worth to pay attention to Długie Lake. Natural and various fauna, including rare species lives there. Extremely poor fauna of caddis flies occurred here about ten years ago. Długie Lake has been recultivated for last years. Perhaps we are observing renaturalization process.

 

Discussion

Today, tourism and recreation form a dominating part of the service sector (Adolfsson et al. 2000). Planning for tourism and recreation attempts to balance the interests of the tourism and recreation sector with other sectors and minimise environmental impact. Our result suggest that water bodies in urban area can play important role in preservation of biodiversity. In artificial waters (e.g. clay pits) and water bodies changed by human activity live many aquatic insects, including rare and endangered species. So, urban area are important in management of nature protection.

The results show, that vulnerable species and natural fauna of the water insects can be preserved within the urban areas. Natural fauna and rare species have been found in recultivated lakes in Olsztyn.  Similar results have been found for large rivers, which can be settled by fauna from the upper section of the river. Some rare species have occurred in the anthropogenic small ponds within the center of the city. We have found more species in the cities than in natural areas. A city may be a temperature- and light-trap for flying insects.

The investigations are continued. We are looking for cooperation and comparative investigations on other group of animals and plants, and in additional towns in different landscapes in Baltic Sea Region.

 

Literature

Adolfsson E., Holmberg Ch., Brena B., 2000. Tourism and recreation. In: Lundin L-Ch. (ed.) River basin management. Sustainable wter management in the Baltic Sea Basin, book III, pp.: 51-59

Czachorowski S., P. Buczyński, 1999: Wskaźnik naturalności biocenoz – potencjalne narzędzie w monitorowaniu stanu ekologicznego torfowisk Polski, na przykładzie Odonata i Trichoptera. [In:] Radwan S., Kornijów R. (ed.): Problemy aktywnej ochrony ekosystemów wodnych i torfowiskowych w polskich parkach narodowych. Wyd. UMCS, Lublin, 153-158.

Czachorowski S., P. Buczyński, 1999: Zagrożenia i ochrona owadów wodnych w Polsce. Wiad. Entomol., 18, Supl. 2: 95-120.

Fischer J., 1996: Bewertungsverfahren zur Quellfauna. Crunoecia 5: 227-240.

Illies J., 1978: Limnofauna Europea. Gustav Fischer Ver., Stuttgart, 532 pp.

Szczęsny B., 1992: Chruściki Trichoptera. [In:] Z. Głowaciński (ed.): Czerwona lista zwierząt ginących i zagrożonych w Polsce. ZOP i ZN PAN, Kraków: 59-64.